<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Blog Catchup&#8230;.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogospeer.com/archives/254/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogospeer.com/archives/254</link>
	<description>Not just another Stumbling Blog.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 20 May 2012 16:59:31 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Debbi</title>
		<link>http://blogospeer.com/archives/254/comment-page-1#comment-2910</link>
		<dc:creator>Debbi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jul 2008 12:16:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogospeer.com/archives/254#comment-2910</guid>
		<description>Spirit is still Dreamworks\&#039; best IMO.  But Kung Fu Panda was definitely better than Wall-E.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Spirit is still Dreamworks\&#8217; best IMO.  But Kung Fu Panda was definitely better than Wall-E.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jon</title>
		<link>http://blogospeer.com/archives/254/comment-page-1#comment-2908</link>
		<dc:creator>Jon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jul 2008 03:47:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogospeer.com/archives/254#comment-2908</guid>
		<description>my friend at work has it the other way, just barely.  Loved Wall-E, thought Kung-Fu Panda was Dreamworks best effort, really good, but not the same as Pixar&#039;s stuff.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>my friend at work has it the other way, just barely.  Loved Wall-E, thought Kung-Fu Panda was Dreamworks best effort, really good, but not the same as Pixar&#8217;s stuff.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

